Section 172(1) of the UK Companies Act 2006 requires directors to act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the company’s success. But what standard of behaviour does this require? The Supreme Court recently considered this in the case of Saxon Woods Investments Limited and others v Francesco Costa [2026] UKSC 21, confirming that although courts will defer to directors’ commercial judgment on how best to promote a company’s success, whether a director has breached that duty still turns partly on an objective standard. Genuine belief in a chosen course does not entitle a director to pursue it by any means necessary.

Continue reading the full GT Alert.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mehmet Karagoz Mehmet Karagoz

Mehmet Karagoz focuses his practice on commercial litigation and civil fraud, advising claimants and defendants with regard to foreign and domestic frauds, internal investigations, and crisis management. He has obtained freezing injunctions against both individuals and companies as well as Norwich Pharmacal Orders…

Mehmet Karagoz focuses his practice on commercial litigation and civil fraud, advising claimants and defendants with regard to foreign and domestic frauds, internal investigations, and crisis management. He has obtained freezing injunctions against both individuals and companies as well as Norwich Pharmacal Orders against third parties including financial institutions, internet service providers, and email providers. He also has experience advising companies and individuals in respect of antecedent transactions in the context of insolvency.

Mehmet is a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). His experience also includes cases involving breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of trust, dishonest assistance, knowing/unconscionable receipt, unlawful means conspiracy, unjust enrichment, deceit, undue influence, and unconscionable bargain. He also advises on unfair prejudice petitions.

Photo of Elliott Fellowes Elliott Fellowes

Elliott is a senior associate in Greenberg Traurig’s London office. He focuses his practice on commercial litigation, civil fraud and asset recovery and banking disputes and has particular experience in high-value, cross border disputes, often involving multiple parties and jurisdictions. Elliott is a…

Elliott is a senior associate in Greenberg Traurig’s London office. He focuses his practice on commercial litigation, civil fraud and asset recovery and banking disputes and has particular experience in high-value, cross border disputes, often involving multiple parties and jurisdictions. Elliott is a solicitor-advocate with rights of audience in the Higher Courts of England and Wales.

He has a broad disputes practice with a particular focus on civil fraud and financial services disputes. Elliott has advised on proceedings across all levels of the English courts, including the Court of Appeal and the Privy Council. He also has experience advising clients before courts in a number of common law jurisdictions, such as the BVI, Bermuda and Singapore, as well as civil law jurisdictions including France and Italy. His work includes securing and opposing a wide range of interim relief, including worldwide freezing and charging orders and acting on enforcement matters. He acts for a diverse client base comprising corporates, private equity firms and other institutional investors (including pension funds) and ultra-high-net-worth individuals.

Elliott has also undertaken a secondment with a specialist funds practice, where he advised institutional litigation funders on funding arrangements and assisted limited partners in connection with private equity secondary market transactions.

Photo of Sophia Kotsianou Sophia Kotsianou

Sophia Kotsianou is a member of the Litigation and Arbitration Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s London office. Sophia focuses her practice primarily on international commercial arbitration and litigation, concentrating on complex multi-jurisdictional cases.